3:30 PM Registration | 4:00 PM Panel | Room NT01 (Ceremonial Classroom)
American University Washington College of Law
4300 Nebraska Ave., NW, Washington DC, 20016
Registration | Logistics and Directions
In PIJIP’s ongoing Supreme Court Series, a panel of counsel for amici and parties will discuss the case on the afternoon following oral argument before the Court.
This event is generously co-sponsored by the Federal Circuit Bar Association.
Issue in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal: Whether 35 U.S.C. § 318(a), which provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review “shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner,” requires that Board to issue a final written decision as to every claim challenged by the petitioner, or whether it allows that Board to issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of only some of the patent claims challenged by the petitioner, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held.
Matthew Topic, Loevy & Loevy, Counsel for Respondent
- Brief of petitioner SAS Institute Inc.
- Brief of respondent ComplementSoft, LLC
- Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc.
- Brief of Federal Respondent
- Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association
- Brief amicus curiae of Houston Intellectual Property Law Association
There will be a second panel immediately after, discussing the Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC argument.