In PIJIP’s ongoing Supreme Court Series, a panel of counsel for amici and parties will discuss the case on the afternoon following oral argument before the Court.
Issue: Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States is an infringing act under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1), exposing the manufacturer to liability for all worldwide sales.
Prof. Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law (Moderator)
Thomas Saunders, WilmerHale (Counsel for Respondent)
Irena Royzman, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP (representing New York IP Law Association on amicus brief)
Prof. Timothy Holbrook, Emory Law School (representing Intellectual Property Professors on amicus brief)
Doris Hines, Finnegan (representing AIPLA on amicus brief)
John Griem, Jr., Carter, Ledyard & Millburn, LLP (representing Agilent Technologies on amicus brief)
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association in support of neither party
- Brief Amicus Curiae AIPLA in support of neither party
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Agilent Technologies, Inc. in support of Petitioners
- Brief Amicus Curiae of the United States in support of Petitioners
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V., et al. in support of Petitioners
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Intellectual Property Professors in support of Petitioners
- Brief Amicus Curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of Respondent
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation in support of Respondent